A structured 15-day engagement that turns a raw idea into a documented, defensible business foundation.
Roughly 42% of failed startups fail because there was no real market need for what they built. Not because the team was wrong, not because the timing was off — because nobody actually wanted the product.
It's the most expensive mistake an early founder can make, and it's almost entirely avoidable. The difference between the founders who burn 12 months on a dead idea and the founders who pivot in week 3 is a single thing: structured validation before commitment.
Most early-stage founders skip validation for one of two reasons. Either:
They're certain the idea is good.
Usually because friends and family said so — and they treat structured validation as a vote of no-confidence.
They don't know what structured validation actually looks like.
So they substitute it with informal user interviews, Reddit posts, or building an MVP to 'see if it works.'
Neither is the same as a documented, evidence-based assessment of whether the idea is worth pursuing. That's what this engagement produces.
A 15-day engagement structured around five interconnected deliverables.
A structured research document that answers the question every founder needs answered before building: is this idea worth pursuing?
{{ d.lead }} {{ d.desc }}
A one-page visual document showing exactly where the startup sits relative to competitors, the differentiated angle, and the defensible space to own.
{{ d.lead }} {{ d.desc }}
A completed, investor-readable BMC.
{{ d.lead }} {{ d.desc }}
An initial pricing recommendation grounded in the competitive landscape and the value proposition. A defensible starting point that lets the founder launch, test, and iterate without underpricing or overpricing from day one.
A GTM plan covering the critical first actions of the commercial launch.
{{ d.lead }} {{ d.desc }}
{{ a.lead }}
{{ a.desc }}
One-time package fee.
Typical delivery, from kickoff to final walkthrough.
{{ f.a }}